|CALENDAR STATUS: Active|
|Melton J. Jackson, Jr. v. Steve Franke|
|Via Video Case 3|
|Andy Simrin on behalf of Melton Jack Jackson, Jr.|
Rebecca M. Auten on behalf of Steve Franke
Statement of Issues:
|(1) Can an attorney perform deficiently by failing to object to evidence that apparently controlling Court of Appeals case law indicates is admissible?|
(2) Is objective evidence of prevailing professional norms admissible to prove whether counsel's failure to raise a particular issue was unreasonable?
These summaries of cases are prepared for the benefit of members of the media to assist them in reporting the court's activities to the public. Parties and practitioners should not rely on the summaries, or the statement of issues to be decided in the summaries, as indicating the questions that the Supreme Court will consider. Regarding the questions that the Supreme Court may consider, see Oregon Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.20.
Justice(s) NOT Participating: